I know this post is late (that is happening more lately), but this is yesterday's post. Just pretend.
If you haven't done so, read the post below regarding Rolling Stone magazine's list of the 100 Greatest Artists and how they made it. In the comments to yesterday's post, Anonymous asked my opinion of the list. So, OK, here it is. It is important to note that I will base my opinions, as best as possible, on an objective basis as to who I think is most important or influential in rock history. I will try to keep my personal preferences to a minimum. (Also, when I say someone should be "lower," I mean further back, less important. When I say someone should be "higher," I mean in a better spot on the list than they are.)
For discussion purposes, here is Rolling Stone's list, as of 2011:
1. The Beatles
2. Bob Dylan
3. Elvis Presley
4. The Rolling Stones
5. Chuck Berry
6. Jimi Hendrix
7. James Brown
8. Little Richard
9. Aretha Franklin
10. Ray Charles
11. Bob Marley
12. The Beach Boys
13. Buddy Holly
14. Led Zeppelin
15. Stevie Wonder
16. Sam Cooke
17. Muddy Watters
18. Marvin Gaye
19. The Velvet Underground
20. Bo Diddley
21. Otis Redding
22. U2
23. Bruce Springsteen
24. Jerry Lee Lewis
25. Fats Domino
26. The Ramones
27. Prince
28. The Clash
29. The Who
30. Nirvana
31. Johnny Cash
32. Smokey Robinson and the Miracles
33. The Everly Brothers
34. Neil Young
35. Michael Jackson
36. Madonna
37. Roy Orbison
38. John Lennon
39. David Bowie
40. Simon and Garfunkel
41. The Doors
42. Van Morrison
43. Sly and the Family Stone
44. Public Enemy
45. The Byrds
46. Janis Joplin
47. Patti Smith
48. Run-DMC
49. Elton John
50. The Band
51. Pink Floyd
52. Queen
53. The Allman Brothers Band
54. Howlin' Wolf
55. Eric Clapton
56. Dr. Dre
57. Grateful Dead
58. Parliament/Funkadelic
59. Aerosmith
60. Sex Pistols
61. Metallica
62. Joni Mitchell
63. Tina Turner
64. Phil Spector
65. The Kinks
66. Al Green
67. Cream
68. The Temptations
69. Jackie Wilson
70. The Police
71. Frank Zappa
72. AC/DC
73. Radiohead
74. Hank Williams
75. The Eagles
76. The Shirelles
77. Beastie Boys
78. The Stooges
79. The Four Tops
80. Elvis Costello
81. The Drifters
82. Creedance Clearwater Revival
83. Eminem
84. James Taylor
85. Black Sabbath
86. Tupac Shakur
87. Gram Parsons
88. Jay-Z
89. The Yardbirds
90. Carlos Santana
91. Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
92. Guns N' Roses
93. Booker T. and the MG's
94. Nine Inch Nails
95. Lynyrd Skynyrd
96. Diana Ross and the Supremes
97. R.E.M.
98. Curtis Mayfield
99. Carl Perkins
100. Talking Heads
First, as far as who is there, and then I will address omissions. I question Nine Inch Nails, Gram Parsons, Tupac, James Taylor and John Lennon. I like and respect them, but this is Top 100. Parsons is cool, but I have always thought that his influence was exaggerated when you look at his actual output. He made some great cutting edge country, but others were better at making a country/rock hybrid. To me, Parsons often sounds straight up country. I know that James Taylor sold a lot of records in the 70's, but there were better, more artistic, and ultimately more influential singer-songwriters in that decade (such as Jackson Browne). John Lennon. As with the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductions of Lennon, McCartney and Harrison all as solo artists, you have to completely separate his status as a Beatle (since they were honored with their own induction/slot on the list). Looking purely and solely at his solo career, it certainly does not deserve #38. I have never gotten why people love Plastic Ono Band so much. I mean, I see that it is so raw, confessional, bare bones, exposes the soul...it just isn't all that good. Perhaps I would not kick John totally off the list, but I would at least push him up to the 90's somewhere.
Now, as far as placement for who is there. CCR a little higher than 82. First of all, I love CCR. But this isn't about my preferences. I think that John Fogerty is one of the great American rock songwriters. Period. His body of work with CCR is almost uniformly strong. He evokes a swampy, Southern American mythos that runs deep in our psyche. Plus, CCR grooves like a motherf*cker.
The Police at 70. I don't know, hard to separate my adulation of The Police, but I think they have been very influential on some newer artists. Perhaps they are good there, but I might push them a bit higher.
The Kinks are way too low. As usual, they are underestimated and forgotten. I have posted whole separate posts on the greatness (and influence) of The Kinks, so I won't repeat it here. They are at 65, I would push them into the Top 20.
Clapton as a solo artist at 55? I'd push him back a bit. Since Cream and Yardbirds are also both on the list, he is rightfully honored for his accomplishments in those bands there. I'd still keep him on the list, but maybe back to the 80's somewhere. I laughed out loud when I read Steven Van Zandt's ridiculous claim in the Clapton essay that Eric is "the most important and influential guitar player that has ever lived, is still living or will ever live. Do yourself a favor, and don't debate me on this." Well Stevie, I will debate you on that. One of the most important and influential, certainly. And then Stevie does go on to make a excellent case for Clapton. But still. Jimi Hendrix and Chuck Berry are both more important and influential. And Rolling Stone knows this too, regardless of Stevie's views. That is why Berry is at 5 and Hendrix at 6, and Clapton at 55 (and Cream at 67 and Yardbirds at 89).
I might put Sly and the Family Stone further back than 43. I've never seen why they were so great. But I could be convinced.
I would push Madonna up about ten slots. Michael Jackson is way too low at 35. Almost to the Top 10 is where he should be, if not in the Top 10. For many younger folk, Jacko is more important than Elvis or The Beatles. Just ask my students.
Johnny Cash is awesome and influential, but 31 is a bit high. Nirvana is too high at 30. Should at best be in the 60's. The Who is too low at 29, give them at least a ten slot boost. Springsteen and U2 maybe a little higher than they are. Everyone loves Bob Marley (as do I), but 11 is a bit high for him. Well, maybe not. I don't know. Jimmy Cliff was also partly responsible to bringing reggae to the world.
Ommissions: The Cure, The Animals, Jeff Beck (in the 90's, at the end of the list, but there nonetheless), Jackson Browne, CSN (they could take James Taylor's slot), Fleetwood Mac, Peter Gabriel, Genesis, Yes, Pearl Jam (perhaps, in the 90's or even at 100), Steely Dan (maybe), Traffic (maybe), ZZ Top (maybe).
Looks like lots of complaints. But honestly, there is much to like about this list too (like the love for Neil Young at 34). It is an improvement over 2004's version.
ABOVE: Where's Peter?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Agreed that Nirvana is way too high. And Nine Inch Nails is on the list at all?? I didn't realize that. Now I realize, even more, how foolish it is to talk about anything Rolling Stone-generated.
Nine Inch Nails????
True, Rolling Stone generated. But it was those musicians, critics and industry people who actually voted.
Post a Comment