Monday, March 17, 2008

Streaks

Yesterday afternoon as I watched the Houston Rockets defeat the Los Angeles Lakers in a glorious victory that marked their 22nd victory in a row and secured them the 1st place spot in the Western Conference, I started thinking about the nature of streaks. Be it in sport, entertainment of some other kind, professionally or whatever.

But first, let’s appreciate what the Rockets have accomplished thus far. Only one team in NBA history has a longer win streak (the ’71-’72 Lakers at 33). Ten of these 22 games have been since All-Star Center Yao Ming had to call it quits for the season due to a bone fracture. The latest win was against the L.A. Lakers, the team tied with the Rockets at the top of the Western Conference. The Lakers kept Rockets star Tracy McGrady to 11 points, yet the team still found a way to beat the Lakers to grab the top spot in the West. Rafer Alston hit 8 three pointers, Shane Battier played tougher defense on Kobe than anyone else has this season, new back-up point guard Bobby Jackson scored 19 points, and new Rockets star Luis Scola had 13 points and 11 rebounds (a player we got in a trade with San Antonio in exchange for $5.00 and a bag of M&M’s). At the beginning of this win streak The Rockets were not even in the playoff picture for the West, now they are atop the Western standings. This partly says something about how tight the West is right now, but it also shows what a scrappy and determined team who were counted out when their best player got knocked out for the season can do. It shows incredible heart.

This started me thinking about streaks in general. The more impressive they are, the more the expectation builds to keep them going. Also the harder the fall when they do come to an end. This is nothing revelatory, I know. It reminds me of an attorney I used to work for whom I admire a great deal and who will remain nameless, but he has supposedly never lost a case that went to trial. This guy has been practicing for awhile, and he has a true killer instinct like any good litigator should. He is also ex-military, which I think instills something that no other experience can. I worked on some fairly tough cases with him, and one of the first things he would say to me as we embarked on a new one was that he has never lost a jury trial, and he intends to keep it that way. More important than the actual case at hand was making sure the win streak was maintained. (Still good for the client, even if the motives for winning were a bit off). This dude has a huge ego, as many trial attorneys do, so this was not surprising. But it is interesting how the burden of a win streak can change the focus of the task at hand.

The Rockets and my old boss aside, can you think of any other impressive streaks? My mind usually goes back to music or movies. As far as music, the two win streaks that immediately come to mind are the Rolling Stones 1968-72 and Pink Floyd 1971-79. For the Stones: try Beggar’s Banquet, Let It Bleed, Get Yer Ya-Ya’s Out, Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street all back to back to back to back to back. As for Floyd, how about Meddle, Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here, Animals and The Wall all in a pretty row. (I am cheating slightly with Floyd, they did put out the minor soundtrack Obscured By Clouds during this time, but it was a soundtrack to a forgotten film, so we can conveniently disregard it). In today’s digital age the significance of a great album is being lost (the subject of a long post in the near future).

Anyway, what even makes a noteworthy streak? There is no magic number, it depends on the arena. In music, having five classic records in a row like the Stones between ’68-’72 is remarkable. In the NBA, getting up to 20 wins in a row is pretty amazing.

So dear readers, I’d be curious of other noteworthy streaks you can think of. It can be sports, music, movies, professionally, personally or whatever. I don’t care the field. Give me some impressive streaks and tell me why they are so impressive. One more for me: today marks 365 days and counting my wife has stayed with me!

17 comments:

Grandes Cigarro said...

Dimaggio's 56 game hit streak. It's possibly one record that will never be broken.

Think about it: you'd essentially have to hit safely through 1/3rd of a MLB season.

JMW said...

Dimaggio's was pretty great, though people have gotten over 40, which means it's at least possible that it will be broken.

Ripken's consecutive games streak -- which is more an endurance record than a skill record -- is very, very, very unlikely to ever be broken.

Also, Rogers Hornsby, starting in 1921, batted .397, .401, .384, .424, and .403. Good lord.

Dezmond, I love that you turn to music and other arts. lt's hardly the same as streaks that can be quantified, like those in sports. But still fun to think about. Even my favorite bands don't normally put out more than two great records in a row. Then they have to regroup and put out something less than perfect before they can knock it out of the park again.

Also, the Rockets' streak is great. I still can't imagine them winning it all without Yao (or even with, honestly), and I'm not saying that as a Mavs fan. In any case, the West playoffs (including the Rockets) should be amazing.

Oh: Happy Anniversary.

pockyjack said...

Can't believe it has been a year. The spurs are better.

How is this for a streak: The nuber of consecutive night my son wakes me up in the middle of the night.

The number of times Willis can respond to a question without actually responding to it.

The number of times the Democrats can screw up an ellection. (Same goes for Florida)

Anonymous said...

Byron Nelson's 11 straight tour victories is impressive. Tiger has gotten to 7 before and just won his 5th consecutive for the 3rd time in his career. 11 straight was considered unreachable until Tiger, but some now think Tiger has a shot to match or exceed it. Is there anything he can't do in golf?

Unknown said...

First of all, it is nice to see the Rockets get a LITTLE respect lately, instead of the constant dismissal and negativity that we are used to hearing here in Houston (pockyjack).

I said at the very beginning of this season that this was the Rockets team that was going to take us back to the Finals, and I stand by that prediction.

However, one portion of your post disturbed me, Dez. Specifically, this sentence..."a player we got in a trade with San Antonio in exchange for $5.00 and a bag of M&M’s." You have always made it very clear that you are a Spurs fan. Granted, you have always liked the Rockets, but San Antonio has been your team. So, it is interesting to me that when the Rockets win 22 games in a row (while, at the same time, San Antonio manages to lose its last four...including squandering a 22-point lead against the Celtics), suddenly, the word "we" is used when referring to the Rockets.

Now, don't get me wrong. I am happy to welcome you back in to the fold. However, if you're in, you're in to stay. No switching alliances when the Rockets get knocked out in the first round of the playoffs, and the Spurs go on to take another title. You have to suffer right along with the rest of us.

So, whats it going to be, Dez? Declare your loyalties right now!

Anonymous said...

I was wondering if anybody else would comment on Dez's eternal flip flopping. I think he's got one drawer in his house for all of his Spurs paraphernalia and another for his Rockets stuff.

Dezmond said...

You people are sorely misinformed. I have been a Rockets fan first my entire life with the exception of a couple years during college and law school, when I briefly flipped to the Spurs. I like both teams, but with the exception of those few lost years, I have been a Rockets fan first and foremost.

Walter, who had Rockets season ticket packages for the last couple of years? I did, my friend. I have shrugged off the last few Spurs championships. Indifferent to them at best. So don't talk to me about bandwagons, because the last few years it would have been much easier to be a Spurs fan first. But I have been firmly in the Rockets camp.

Unknown said...

Oh, how I wish I saved old e-mails! I am almost positive that there have been several occasions, long after law school, that you consoled yourself over a dissapointing Rockets season with the justification that you were first and foremost a Spurs fan. But, of course, I have no proof of that, so I'll let it drop. Perhaps I am mistaken, but I have simply always thought of you as a Spurs guy.

As for your season tickets, come on! You were living in Houston. Of course, you were going to Rockets games! If I lived in New York, I would go see Yankees games (assuming I wasn't fortunately closer to Shea Stadium). However, that doesn't make me a Yankees fan, or a semi-enthusiast, or someone who can even stand the Yankees! Right, jmw?

Regardless, past affiliations make no difference. I am more than happy to have you on the Rockets side. I would say I need you to help me work on pockyjack, but he's fairly easy. All it takes is the offer of tickets, and his bluster and bravado disappear almost immediately. You've never seen a faster show of support!

pockyjack said...

Wow, you figured me out!

Luckily I am not a blind fan like you are. I am a fan of the best and classiest organizations. That is why I am a Spurs fan. I have never lived in San Antonio, but I love Tim Duncan (ESPECIALLY how boring he is). I had the pleasure of knowing Mr. Duncan whilst in College and had a few classes with him. I also like the spurs coaching staff and their system of play. It is boring as hell, but effective.

The rockets are just a collection of free agents. There is no "ness" to the rockets. They may be good, but they are not Houston's team, in the same way the Astros have been for most of their existence (I am concerned about their new GM, but that is a sotry for another post). I also think the astros are a classy organization, even if they don't win all the time.

That is why I have bandwagon fans like dez and walter. You are no different thatn the rednecks who buy carolina blue knockoff jearseys or yankee hats. Plus, you are a bunch of Homers.


I used to love the rockets when they had a core group that grew up together in the 90s, but this group feels different. There are some thugs (though Bonzi is off the team) and Yao and Tracy just don't seem to click. I think the Astros and Texans are classier organizations, though they may not win as much as the rockets are right now. I will still cheer for them, because they are my hometown team, but I am not a homer like you all seem to be or want me to be.

Also, after last nights debacle, the wheels are going to come off. My new prediction is that the Rockets will be at best a 6th seed and lose like always in the first round.

Unknown said...

I completely admit to being a homer. There is no question about it. I simply think it's more fun to root for and support a team whose games I can go and see on a regular basis. Plus, I like the feel of the city when your team is doing well. If I never lived in Houston, would I be the Astros or Rockets fan that I am...absolutely not. So, I can not argue with you on that point. However, I can say with certainty that if I ever moved away from Houston, the Astros and the Rockets would remain my teams. So, as long as I am consistent and don't jump ship when the going gets tough, who really cares why I originally started supporting the team in the first place?

That being said, I think you need to look into the definition of "bandwagon". How can I be a bandwagon fan when I have supported these teams through some VERY dark and lonely times? Try sitting through an Astros game in the middle of June, when the team is seven or eight games back, and sitting in fourth or fifth place in the Central. You'll find very few bandwagon fans at those games.

As for a collection of free agents, I think you are absolutely correct about the Astros. I am still coming to grips with how I feel about what has happened this off-season, and I think it will be very interesting to see how well the city supports this team, considering this is really the first time in recent memory that they have not had a group of familiar faces to come out and cheer for.

However, I have to disagree when it comes to the Rockets. Yes, obviously several additions have been made to the team, as will always happen. But, Yao and Tracy have been here for quite some time, and I think they have become this generation's Hakeem and Clyde...only not nearly as good.

Speaking of McGrady, is there something wrong with him? I mean, does he have some sort of genuine psychological problem when it comes to performing under national attention? It's really a little frustrating, and it's getting harder and harder to dismiss.

Setting his performance aside, though, I don't think last night was quite the "debacle" you describe it as. Sure, it would have been nice to have had a better showing, but a loss at some point was inevitable, and we were playing the best team in basketball. I think tonight's game is going to be the true predictor. If we can shake off last night's results and show up strong tonight, then there is no reason why last night's game should have any long-term effect. If we lose tonight, though, and our attitude turns frustrated and defeated, then I will admit that it might be difficult to avoid our patented Rockets slide.

Dezmond said...

Yes, T-Mac does have a very delicate psyche. That is why I do not believe the Rockets will win a championship with Tracy McGrady. He does not have it in him. I am still a big Rockets fan, but I am not so blind to ignore reality (Walter).

T-Mac and Yao are both great, but I agree with Pocky in that they do not seem too compatible. I some ways, I prefer the team when one or the other is out, because then they can really focus on a style of play to fit the remaining star.

T-Mac and Yao this generation's Hakeem and Clyde? Clyde was with this team, what, two years? I do not mythologize Cyde Drexler as much as many Houstonians do, I think he got lucky to come back to the Rockets when a dominant Hakeem was still there.

I am still of the opinion we trade McGrady while we can still get value for him.

And Yao needs to not get hurt every year. He is dominant when he is healthy.

Dezmond said...

...oh, and most of the NBA is a bunch of free agents. There are fewer and fewer stars associated with teams througout their careers these days. Kobe-Lakers, Yao-Rockets, LeBron-Cleveland.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

How am I blind to reality? I was the one that mentioned the fact that McGrady had problems in the first place. As far as going to The Finals, I still feel that the team has what it takes to make it. I have never said that they would WIN the championship. However, I definitely think that they have the components necessary to get past their Western Conference competition.

As for Drexler, all I am saying is that when you think of the Championship years in the 90's, the team was Hakeem and Clyde. Besides, the two will always be linked due to their time at the University of Houston. (Phi Slamma Jamma, baby!) If Drexler is "mythologized" by Houstonians, it is due as much, if not more, to his time in college, than it is to his time with the Rockets.

Now, on to the things we agree on...

I didn't realize we were talking about the compatibility between Yao and Tracy. If that is indeed the subject, then yes, I agree.

McGrady should be traded...agree.

Yao plays better when he's not injured...agree.

Unknown said...

Now, THAT was a debacle! See, Pocky, you can't go throwing these terms around lightly, because then you have nothing left when the wheels REALLY start to fall off.

Anonymous said...

Rockets' streak is over.

pockyjack said...

I disagree. A new Rockets streak has just begun